Claude 3.5 Haiku
Claude 3.5 Haiku was the model that first proved a Haiku-tier release could match Opus-class performance, scoring strong results on SWE-bench Verified and redefining expectations for what fast, affordable models could accomplish on real engineering tasks.
import { streamText } from 'ai'
const result = streamText({ model: 'anthropic/claude-3.5-haiku', prompt: 'Why is the sky blue?'})Playground
Try out Claude 3.5 Haiku by Anthropic. Usage is billed to your team at API rates. Free users (those who haven't made a payment) get $5 of credits every 30 days.
Providers
Route requests across multiple providers. Copy a provider slug to set your preference. Visit the docs for more info. Using a provider means you agree to their terms, listed under Legal.
P50 throughput on live AI Gateway traffic, in tokens per second (TPS). Visit the docs for more info.
P50 time to first token (TTFT) on live AI Gateway traffic, in milliseconds. View the docs for more info.
Direct request success rate on AI Gateway and per-provider. Visit the docs for more info.
More models by Anthropic
| Model |
|---|
| 1M | 6.8s | 86tps | $10.00/M | $50.00/M | Read:$1/M Write: $12.5/M | $10/K + input costs | — | +3 |  | 06/09/2026 | |||
| 1M | 2.2s | 106tps | $5.00/M | $25.00/M | Read:$0.5/M Write: $6.25/M | $10/K + input costs | — | +4 |   | 05/28/2026 | |||
| 1M | 1.3s | 101tps | $5.00/M | $25.00/M | Read:$0.5/M Write: $6.25/M | $10/K + input costs | — | +4 | | 04/16/2026 | |||
| 1M | 0.9s | 52tps | $3.00/M | $15.00/M | Read:$0.3/M Write: $3.75/M | $10/K + input costs | — | +4 | | 02/17/2026 | |||
| 1M | 0.8s | 56tps | $5.00/M | $25.00/M | Read:$0.5/M Write: $6.25/M | $10/K + input costs | — | +4 | | 02/05/2026 | |||
| 200K | 0.5s | 113tps | $1.00/M | $5.00/M | Read:$0.1/M Write: $1.25/M | $10.00/K + input costs | — | +3 | | 10/15/2025 |
About Claude 3.5 Haiku
Before Claude 3.5 Haiku arrived on November 6, 2023, the Haiku tier was the budget option: fast and cheap, but a step down in capability. Claude 3.5 Haiku broke that assumption. Anthropic announced it matched Claude 3 Opus on many intelligence evaluations while running at speeds comparable to the original Claude 3 Haiku. The result: Opus-class reasoning at Haiku-class latency.
The SWE-bench Verified result crystallized this. At 40.6%, Claude 3.5 Haiku outperformed agents built on the original Claude 3.5 Sonnet and other comparable models at the time on real-world software engineering tasks: fixing bugs, implementing features, and navigating codebases. For a model designed for speed and low cost, posting that score on a benchmark requiring sustained multi-file reasoning was a landmark.
Anthropic designed Claude 3.5 Haiku for three deployment patterns: latency-sensitive user-facing products, specialized sub-agent roles inside agentic pipelines, and personalization engines processing large volumes of per-user data such as purchase histories, pricing records, and inventory feeds. Improved instruction following and more accurate tool use make it practical for the structured, schema-bound work that sub-agents handle in production systems.
Live rates are shown in the pricing panel on this page.
What To Consider When Choosing a Provider
- Configuration: For sub-agent architectures where Claude 3.5 Haiku handles a high volume of narrow tasks, AI Gateway per-request cost tracking helps attribute spend to individual workflow branches.
- Zero Data Retention: AI Gateway supports Zero Data Retention for this model via direct gateway requests (BYOK is not included). To configure this, check the documentation.
- Authentication: AI Gateway authenticates requests using an API key or OIDC token. You do not need to manage provider credentials directly.
When to Use Claude 3.5 Haiku
Best For
- Coding assistance at scale: The 40.6% SWE-bench score brings real engineering capability without Sonnet-tier cost
- Sub-agent pipelines: Fast enough for high-frequency subtask execution with strong instruction compliance
- Latency-critical interfaces: Autocomplete, inline suggestions, and live enrichment where response time affects user experience
- Data-heavy personalization: Processes per-user records and generates tailored outputs in real time
- High-volume tool calling: Accurate function invocation at speed drives automated workflows
Consider Alternatives When
- Computer use capability: That feature shipped with Claude 3.5 Sonnet, not Haiku
- Extended or adaptive thinking: Modes for harder reasoning tasks are unavailable on this model
- Vision-heavy workloads: Sonnet or Opus variants score higher on image-centric benchmarks
Conclusion
Claude 3.5 Haiku raised the capability ceiling for the fast tier of Anthropic's model family. Opus-level intelligence running at Haiku speeds opens coding, agentic, and personalization workloads that previously required a larger, slower, more expensive model. The release stays relevant for any team optimizing the cost-capability tradeoff.
Frequently Asked Questions
What made Claude 3.5 Haiku historically significant within Anthropic's lineup?
Claude 3.5 Haiku was the first Haiku-class model to reach Opus-level benchmark performance. Before this release, the fast tier meant a clear capability step-down. Claude 3.5 Haiku closed much of the gap between the smallest and largest models in a generation.
How does the 40.6% SWE-bench Verified score translate to real-world coding work?
SWE-bench Verified tests a model's ability to read natural language bug reports and feature requests, navigate real open-source codebases, and produce working patches. A 40.6% score means the model resolved that proportion of real software engineering tasks drawn from production repositories.
Was the December 2024 pricing change an increase or decrease from launch?
Rates are listed on this page. They reflect the providers routing through AI Gateway and shift when providers update their pricing.
What kinds of sub-agent tasks is 3.5 Haiku well suited for?
Narrow, well-defined tasks within a larger pipeline: data extraction, format conversion, classification, schema validation, and structured tool invocation. Low latency and strong instruction following make it effective for the high-frequency, low-ambiguity work that sub-agents typically handle.
Does Claude 3.5 Haiku handle multilingual inputs?
The model processes multilingual text, though its primary optimization targets are English-language tasks. For workloads where multilingual instruction following is the central requirement, evaluate against benchmark results for your specific languages.
What is the practical difference between 3.5 Haiku and later Haiku generations for new projects?
Claude 3.5 Haiku is a Claude 3.5 generation model. Later Haiku releases build on newer base architectures with different capability profiles. For new projects, compare the specific benchmarks and feature sets relevant to your workload rather than assuming the newer generation is universally better.